Search for: "People v J."
Results 3881 - 3900
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
Not a smart idea, rules Birss JEleonora reports on Omnibill v Egpsxxx and Carter [2014] EWHC 3762 (IPEC), a spicy case concerning copyright, escort services and pornographic photographs which Birss J had just issued in the IPEC. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Lauren J. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Not even people outside of the business sector would be safe from the Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Jump to: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W A Back to top Acute care – A high level of care provided to a patient for a medical condition or illness that a patient is likely to recover from. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm
J. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
| The 17th draft of UPC Rules of Procedure.Never too late 18 [week ending Sunday 2 November] -- The Limerick Competition results | More on CJEU in BestWater | The GC in Laguiole | France to review its IP Code | Reports on the “no patents round-up for non-techie people” event | Renting an orphan work in the UK | Aldi and look-alikes | The UK Supreme Court in Servier v Apotex | Are patent trolls really a… [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:24 am
On the evidential material before him, the officer was clearly entitled to conclude that J's risk of relapse did not make him any more vulnerable than the ordinary homeless person. (3) The court was bound by Johnson v Solihull MBC [2013] H.L.R. 39, and it was not open to argue that the correct comparator had to be the ordinary person in the local authority's district (para.55). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
The post Punish v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
(People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Never too late 16 [week ending Sunday 19 October] -- The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Nampak Plastics Europe Ltd v Alpla UK Ltd | Former Eagle member claims infringement of his name in the US | The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Specsavers v Asda | A change in format for the European Patent Attorney exam | Reflections over IP5 patent filing figures | ‘Common Sense For Copyright’… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Buck 2007The Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood by Robert J. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
It says that “[j]ust as law enforcement agencies may establish physical-world undercover entities; they also may establish online undercover facilities, such as bulletin board systems, Internet service providers, and World Wide Web sites, which covertly offer information or services to the public. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 74 (1938), when federal courts preside over cases brought under their “diversity jurisdiction,” which lets them hear suits involving people from different U.S. states, they applystate law in making relevant decisions. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:52 am
Saly J. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
J appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
