Search for: "People v Keys" Results 3881 - 3900 of 8,029
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
The company also has paid approximately $42 million in compensation to people and companies affected by the spill. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:32 pm by Brandon D'Agostino
  Allowing too many people to initiate and manage litigation holds could lead to confusion for IT and will certainly yield different results across multiple matters. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm by Cory Carlson
Such consistent application fosters predictability within the system of law, and predictability is arguably the key selling point of The Common Law legal system. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am by Phil Dixon
Supreme Court has recognized exigent circumstances where the was an imminent threat of harm to people or an imminent threat of destruction of evidence, among others. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 3:44 am by SHG
Defendant sought to introduce evidence of the specific violent conduct underlying four of the victim’s prior youthful offender adjudications to prove that the victim was the initial aggressor with respect to deadly physical force (see People v Brown, 33 NY3d 316, 321 [2019]). [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
How are lawyers supposed to advise clients who want to form or are already operating Delaware limited liability companies on the critical question of manager fiduciary duties in the wake of last week’s blockbuster ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court in the Auriga Capital v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision this week in State v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:52 pm by Sophie Lees (AU)
A recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia, Career Step, LLC v TalentMed Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 132 (Career Step) provides a useful reminder of the principles that apply when determining whether a new copyright work is the result of joint authorship. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:52 pm by Sophie Lees (AU)
A recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia, Career Step, LLC v TalentMed Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 132 (Career Step) provides a useful reminder of the principles that apply when determining whether a new copyright work is the result of joint authorship. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:40 am by SHG
The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. [read post]