Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 3881 - 3900 of 37,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2020, 6:39 am by Mark Movsesian
This litigation also reached the Supreme Court, in a 2016 case called Zubik v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
In 2013, Pulaski and the 11 state court defendants reached a settlement agreement. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 3:15 pm by Marta Belcher
The Bank Secrecy Act requires banks to maintain financial records because of their usefulness in investigations, and in 1976, the Supreme Court (in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
 The Monomeles Protodikeio: an insider's viewLast December the IPKat reported on Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA, a request by a Greek court, the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon, for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court quoted the case of Secretary Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:32 pm by Lisa S. Charbonneau
  The state minimum wage is statutorily set to increase yearly until it reaches $15.00 for all employees in 2023 (2022 for employers with more than 25 employees). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm by Daniel Richman
United States, waded back into Apprendi land to overrule the long-beleaguered Harris v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 8:03 am
On Thursday, we noted that the Ohio Supreme Court had upheld two tort reform provisions in Arbino v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 10:30 am by Anderson Franco Law
A multi-vehicle collision occurred early this morning on State Route 24 Westbound, just west of Pleasant Hill, resulting in one reported injury. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cyberheat CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]