Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2008, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court's decision last year in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 12:57 pm
That is how it should be.Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:10 pm
" Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:04 am
"Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Now with the passage of the Bush administration's economic stimulus package, the GSEs and the Federal Housing Administration can temporarily purchase loans beyond the conventional loan limit.[31] With the exception of Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and the U.S. virgin Islands, the cap on loans that the two GSEs can back have been temporarily increased from $417,000 to $729,750 until the end of 2008 for more than 70 U.S. counties.[32] This change will… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:46 pm
We all know that by the time the Supreme Court got done with Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Great job.P.S. - Lest one think that all opinions are like Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
President Bush can order that States will comply with the ICJ. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
President Bush can order that States will comply with the ICJ. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 5:47 pm
(Nov 2004) Supports state funding of contraceptive services. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
" The plan states that such Fed actions "should be coordinated and implemented with the appropriate regulatory agency to the fullest extent possible. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
The patent system of the United States is internationally recognized as the world's strongest form of intellectual property protection. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
Second, even if the state courts were not bound directly by Avena, were they bound to comply with Bush's Memorandum specifically directing them to comply with Avena? [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Yesterday SCOTUS decided MEDELLIN v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
" At a White House briefing, press secretary Dana Perino said President Bush was disappointed with the decision, but "we respect the court's decision and will abide by it. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
Similarly, the Bush memo has no binding authority over states, the majority said. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 9:49 am
See Medellin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 7:52 am
The Oyez page for the Medellin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:37 am
Bush then issued a memorandum stating that the United States would "discharge its international obligations" under Avena "by having State courts give effect to the decision. [read post]
