Search for: "See v. See"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 122,037
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 11:53 am
That was the position of Florida’s 1st District Court of Appeal in the 2006 South Florida medical malpractice case of Beck v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:53 am
That was the position of Florida’s 1st District Court of Appeal in the 2006 South Florida medical malpractice case of Beck v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
One of the longest legal cases based on position trade marks is Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
” “Although Family Court may properly dismiss objections for failure to comply with Family Court Act § 439 (e) under some circumstances (see generally Matter of Minka v Minka, 219 AD2d 810, 810-811 [4th Dept 1995]), strict compliance with the statute is not always required (see Sigourney, 192 AD3d at 1483). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Likewise, the Ingber v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:25 am
This test was met on the facts [see para 22] and so the FMAT had jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Acquiescence is a topic of interest following the CJEU in Heitec (see Volume 9) and the UK Court of Appeal in Combe (see Volume 12). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
In recent years, it has become apparent that, despite the shared obligation for all Member States to adhere to the same fundamental rights standards, their practices are sometimes not in line with these standards (see for example the Dutch life long prison sentence which was not in line with Article 3 ECHR until recently (Murray v. the Netherlands, app. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
One will see more of this in the coming years in a variety of areas as globalization is "reworked". [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:34 am
” (People v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm
Similarly, in “Camp v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 1:38 am
See id. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
For example, in Thomas v. [read post]
