Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 23,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 10:48 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:36 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
PetConnect Rescue, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:44 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Instead of selling equity, companies that use ICOs sell digital “tokens” to investors. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:48 am
In Colombia, Apple can't sell the brand new iPhone 14 while Ericsson is enforcing a patent injunction. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am
This concept is demonstrated by Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 01665 [170 AD3d 461] March 7, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department where the claims that plaintiff would have altered his stock selling future conduct had the attorneys given certain advice was rejected. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court, Jan. 22, 2019, Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
IPKat focuses its lens on a decision given last year [Merpel says: "it is never too late to inform IPKat readers"] by the UK High Court in Sprint Electric Ltd v Buyer’s Dream Ltd [2018] EWHC 1924 (Ch). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:43 am
Foster v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:27 am
Jun. 20, 2016); Etling v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:45 am
[DSPT Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
Zuckerman Family Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am
The decision does set the bar quite high, and anyone selling authentic goods for a lower price would be safe, but anyone trying to ride the coat tails of a more well-known brand, selling inferior or different branded goods, might just fall foul of the precedent set. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:01 am
Silver Streak Industries LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
Indigo Vapor Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
The case is Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
By previous arrangement, Harris agreed to sell Gulleman seven pills for $210. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:47 pm
You can't sell a client's documents to its adversary -- or threaten to do so -- merely to get your client to pay you (or to make a fast buck). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:05 am
On July 8, 2011, Peck submitted the screenplay.Based on custom and practice in the industry and prior dealings between UTA and Peck, UTA understood that the submission was not gratuitous and was made for the purpose of selling the screenplay to a UTA client. [read post]
