Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
In Criminal Procedure, one of the worst lines of decision that remains unremedied is  the doctrine represented by Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:33 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
-http://goo.gl/YfP7qTories file complaint over NDP convention sponsorship -http://goo.gl/MBELDOnline Defamation on Political Blogs in Baglow v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
The chairman of McDermott Will & Emery, the 1,000-lawyer firm whose bankruptcy practice Smith heads, is ready to prostrate himself before the judge as well; according to a motion filed by the firm, Harvey Freishtat plans to fly to Miami for a hearing on Smith's comment. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 462 (1981) (quotation and emphasis omitted). [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:56 am by Kent Scheidegger
Circuit Judges Milan Smith and Mark Bennett concur in the order, while Senior Circuit Judge A. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Judge granted summary judgment against American States and they appealed. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:11 am
"By not even having found one of these people, that does not convey substantial disenfranchisement," Judge Richard Posner said when the case was argued in Chicago. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
Smith of the Memphis, Tennessee, law firm of Apperson Crump, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
  The court then took up Spence’s argument that the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury on constructive possession. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]