Search for: "State v. Cash " Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am by Kit Case
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
French-Google partnership may blossom (IPKat)   Germany Judge jeopardizes DigiProtect anti-piracy cash operation (TorrentFreak)   Italy Court of Bergamo rules that Italian ISPs must block customer access to The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak)   Norway Pirate movie privacy case set for the Supreme Court (TorrentFreak) Court rejects IFPI appeal for ISP Telenor to block The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak)   South Africa Life is too short – novel cybersquatting threat, positive… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am by Marie Louise
: Telstra & Anor v Phone Directories Co & Ors (IP Whiteboard)   Canada The daily digital lock dissenter, day 8: Documentary Organisation of Canada (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 7: Canadian Civil Liberties Association (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 6: Canadian Federation of Students (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 5: Canadian Teachers’ Federation (Michael Geist) Canada proposes (another) copyright… [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions A journalist based in Goa is defending a defamation action brought by a regional newspaper after he published allegations “in which he claims a newspaper offered him media coverage for cash“, reports Press Gazette. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
* LA Times: YouTube’s biggest stars are cashing in offline CyberSecurity * Does the White House CyberSec Coordinator Need Tech Expertise? [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It explains that there have been number of stories exposing how ‘politicians, multinationals, celebrities and high-net-worth individuals use complex structures to protect their cash from higher taxes. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
Booker states that the significance of the judgment was that it seemed to ‘abet’ contractors who will ‘cash in’ and the lawyers will ‘exploit’ the supposed blurring of the risks associated with white asbestos and blue and brown respectively to promote an explosion of compensation claims. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm by azatty
And, more important, the United States Supreme Court agrees with me. [read post]