Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
Instead, the Court vacated the ruling and returned it to the state appeals court. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
., Plaintiffs-Respondents-Appellants, v Poisson & Hackett, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Respondents. 3142, 118056/04 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT 2008 NY Slip Op 2644; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 5:03 am
The consequentialist version of imperfect procedural justice finds substantial support in the decisions of the Supreme Court that interpret the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:43 pm
In Villanueva v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:53 am
The New Jersey Lawyer newspaper reported the case of State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
I therefore believe the denial of the City's summary judgment motion was correct, and I must respectfully dissent.Michael Jason Surber v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:52 pm
Since that time, as I have posted, New York courts began to recognize the validity of same sex marriages. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
On cross-appeal, Celebration and the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division I of Marion County ("BZA") assert we should dismiss this appeal because Crooked Creek does not have standing to challenge a zoning variance. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
In Sterling the New York Court of Appeals held that the presumption of actual implied authority was rebutted, or did not apply in the first instance, where the president initiated a lawsuit notwithstanding that the corporation's board, by a deadlocked vote, had failed to authorize the litigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
Finally, the December 2007 Marciano decision makes a cameo appearance in the New York Court of Appeals' controversial February 2008 decision in Tzolis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
The Court of Appeal for New Brunswick dismissed the appeal from the reviewing judge, and the matter thus ended up at the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?) [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:17 am
Bernaski, 22, the state's highest court ruled that an Orange County city improperly denied tax exemptions to a home for the elderly and a social work organization devoted to the poor. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) held that the trial court correctly sustained the defendant's demurrer to the plaintiff's UCL claim without leave to amend. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The district judge's decision was upheld by the Queen's Bench Divisional Court in the decision subject to this appeal to the House. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
The Circuit Court also noted that plaintiff’s EEOC charge had included the instruction: “I want this Class Action Charge filed with both the EEOC and the State and local Agency, if any. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
This appeal is from those two orders.1. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
A1179
Gunther (MS) -- Sets forth procedures to be followed in the event a sex offender fails to mail a signed verification within twenty calendar days of mailing by division of criminal justice services Same as S 5570 Last Act: 03/04/08 reported referred to codesA1188
Eddington (MS) -- Expands coverage of sex offender registration act No Same as Last Act: 03/04/08 reported referred to codesA2564B
Benjamin -- Requires division of… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE UPPER DECK COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v.ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 11:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
