Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3881 - 3900 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
First, if a district court judge doesn't understand what the expert is saying he can either require him to speak in plain English or appoint the court's own expert. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Gaas, Sumit Kumar Arora, for Cash Zone, LLC dba Cash Biz, Appellant.Appeal from the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2015-CI-01545, Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding.REVERSED AND RENDERED; REMANDED FOR ARBITRATION.Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice, Rebeca C. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:37 am
Lee, there the Court pushed back on this theory: [I]nter partes review is less like a judicial proceeding and more like a specialized agency proceeding. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
 LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and… [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
First, there is the loss of fees. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 7:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
One is by the attorneys general from sixteen blue states filed in the Eastern District of New York; the other is by the Regents of the University of California filed in the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:10 pm by Peter Margulies
” That observation dovetails with the Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 8:11 am by Joy Waltemath
While the Sundance court opined that terminating grievance proceedings constitutes an adverse employment action, the entire discussion was dicta, the judge first noted, arguing that Sundance did not control and thus that this was an issue of first impression. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:43 am by SHG
The Court stated that it would first consider whether the legislative intent was to impose punishment; if so, “that ends the inquiry. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:08 am by John Floyd
  In March 2016, the Court held in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of August 31, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including six Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, three judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and one judge for the United States District Courts. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
That’s the hot, exciting subject of Wednesday’s Nevada federal district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]