Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 45,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
(See City of Tacoma v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
". . . . defendant continued yelling before walking out, stating, 'You know[] what? [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:28 am
In 1999, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
Seventh Circuit Decides That Claim For Payment Under Automobile Insurance Policy Cannot Be Certified
1 Jun 2007, 8:09 am
Judge Posner's opinion in Pastor v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:47 am
The McDonald Court found a long history of self defense. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 7:07 am
Indeed, to the outsider the most remarkable thing about the argument next week in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm
In the 1974 case Gertz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
As long as I am on the topic of the Federalists, I might as well repeat a question to Rick Garnett that I asked him on our panel at the Federalist Society - to whit, why don't good Federalist Society members support the Court's decisions in Grutter, Kelo, and Locke v Davey? [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm
See Brinkley v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 8:20 am
” Kuhn v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:32 pm
On May 21, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Noll v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
In Adolph v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
Paxton, and now United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari review of United States v. [read post]
