Search for: "State v. May"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 120,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
Avila v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Comment The Supreme Court’s unanimous conclusion on the applicability of the “manifestly without reasonable foundation” test may disappoint rights advocates. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
In New York State, grandparents have the right to petition for visitation with their grandchildren, but the circumstances in which they may do so are limited. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:23 am
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm
While the stay may not be in place, subsequent legal proceedings may still explore these issues further. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:24 pm
Gulf-Inland, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Olympus Spa v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Luvene, 118 Wn.2d 826, 844-5, 827 P.2d 1374 (1992) (citizens must be given clear notice of prohibited conduct); and Mays v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:23 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 2:49 pm
The SJC decided the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
A substantial evidentiary record documents that the federal government has long promoted fossil fuel use despite knowing that it can cause catastrophic climate change, and that failure to change existing policy may hasten an environmental apocalypse. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:04 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61 (QB) (21 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Mhango, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1321 (Admin) (10 June 2010) Am, R (on the application of) v The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2010] EWHC 1228 (Admin) (28 May 2010) The Law Society of England and Wales, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor… [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:35 am
Co. of Wausau v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
If left unchecked,” Kagan wrote, “gerrymanders like the ones here may irreparably damage our system of government. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:44 am
May 10, 2012).* Circuit courts have split on the issue whether Brady v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:02 pm
My fear is big brother or a police state may be closer now than ever before. [read post]
