Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 57,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court said no. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am
Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:55 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In State of Alaska, Department of Education & Early Development v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 pm
And the judge said, Right.And Chafee said, Go fuck yourself.OK, that's not exactly what the judge said, and it isn't how Chaffee put it (at least publicly) either. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:01 am
The depositions in question were taken in another case, McFarland v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Court found with the 55th Arab Brigade in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:43 am
From a quick read of the case State v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:31 am
The majority Appeals Court, in this partially split decision (dissent in part, concur in part), said in conclusion, "In its opinion and order denying a preliminary injunction, the district court stated that 'the State has not yet met its burden of proving that bacteria in the waters of the IRW are caused by the application of poultry litter rather than by other sources . . . . [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
See Unifund CCR Partners v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
The 2nd DCA affirmed the dismissal of the case, citing precedent set by the Florida Supreme Court in Mizrahi v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
The 2nd DCA affirmed the dismissal of the case, citing precedent set by the Florida Supreme Court in Mizrahi v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:47 am
The case, Stern v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The Court themselves said at para. 67 that they remained “unconvinced that its approach could be reconciled with the correct legal analysis, as now accepted by [counsel to the SSHD]. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:15 am
’” The court said, The federal and state lawsuits in this case are far from parallel. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Specifically, citing McCreary County v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
But the First Department said the claims in state court are analyzed differently than the claims that were dismissed in federal court. [read post]
