Search for: "State v. Sample" Results 3881 - 3900 of 4,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Chicago, which considers whether the 2nd amendment should be incorporated to the states United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
H argued that this was wrong and stated that the exclusion of 16 properties from a sample of just 111 demonstrated that the 16 properties were not really so exceptional. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
H argued that this was wrong and stated that the exclusion of 16 properties from a sample of just 111 demonstrated that the 16 properties were not really so exceptional. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm by Liz Kurtz
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:46 am by Ashby Jones
Common Cause: The Supreme Court of the United States handed down a decision today that will enhance the ability of the deepest-pocketed special interests to influence elections and the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Brett Trout
Brett Trout Tags: patent Related posts Vote BlawgIT – Best Patent Blog (0) United State Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Bilski (business method) Patent Case (0) Transformers v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm by Mark Ashton
 Under the last set of guidelines any case where income exceeded $20,000 was to be decided based upon proven expenses under a 1984 case, Melzer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
This post provides a sampling of some important events in international criminal law over the holiday season. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
In State v Ciancaglini, the State appealed from the Law Division trial court's decision that the defendant should have been sentenced as a first offender for her DWI conviction. [read post]