Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
” Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:52 pm
EJS: How could Justice Thomas get confirmed after he said under oath that he had never discussed Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. and Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
And yet constant surveillance in the public sphere implicates some of the same concerns that several members of the Supreme Court raised in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
The Supreme Court released an opinion today in Voisine v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:22 am
Kennedy, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm
The issue before the Supreme Court in Koons v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
It’s like the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:39 am
The oral argument in Dahda v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
Justice Ginsburg dissented (joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan), arguing that "the constitutional limits on a state court's adjudicatory authority derive from considerations of due process, not state sovereignty. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:39 am
Board of Education and Garcetti v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
Other coverage focuses on Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
On the left, Justice Sotomayor repeatedly stated her view that the particularized violation of any legal right conferred by Congress is an injury in fact sufficient to create standing. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
In a short statement joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sotomayor explained that Patrick’s case involved the same question on which she had previously dissented from the denial of review: whether defendants sentenced under mandatory sentencing guidelines can rely on the court’s 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
