Search for: "State v. State" Results 3881 - 3900 of 258,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
 Who've decided to use eminent domain to take the water assets of Golden State and to pay for it with Mello-Roos bonds.The Court of Appeal is fine with that. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
Nationwide and In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation -- I would flat out drop my red Yellowstone mug of decaf with the white moose silhouette in amazement if the result were any different in State Farm's interlocutory appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:12 pm
The Eleventh Circuit recently decided an interesting case applying the Fourth Amendment to computer networks, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 9:05 am
Last month, Judge Ken Karas of the Southern District of New York handed down a very interesting Fourth Amendment decision, United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:04 am
United States, a rather odd case involving e-mail privacy. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:33 pm by The Complex Litigator
On December 6, 2010, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in what will eventually be known as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
The Appeals Court explained that Malcolm Moulton challenges the district court's approval of a settlement agreement arising from a class action filed by the neighbors of a steel mill owned by United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm by Howard Wasserman
And so the Ninth Circuit held on Thursday in PragerU v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:44 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
State v Vaughn In arguing that he had ineffective trial counsel, Vaughn stated that his attorney should not have requested consecutive sentences. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
   I want to respond here to two points made by Paul, both of which I regard as highly creative, which in this context means that they are clever but really have no relationship to reality.First, Colorado v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
   I want to respond here to two points made by Paul, both of which I regard as highly creative, which in this context means that they are clever but really have no relationship to reality.First, Colorado v. [read post]