Search for: "State v. Townes"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 5,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2012, 5:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A bit of digging into United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
And yet five Appeals Court justices could not agree on the meaning of that disclaimer (DeWolfe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
According to the indictment, in late November 2010, WikiLeaks released a large amount of classified United States State Department cables on its website. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
This quotation from the Supreme Court's opinion in Tumey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:12 am
Sure, they can require you to notify the police when you move into a jurisdiction, and can forbid you from living in most parts of town. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Payments in contemplation of retirement excluded in determining an individual’s final average salary for purposes of retirement Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897 The Employees’ Retirement System member commenced service with the Town and served as its police chief from 1996 until his retirement in 2002. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
Town of Phillipsburg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
The Secretary of State must act with reasonable diligence to progress deportation. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:17 am
The fliers stated: "WARNING! [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
Cohen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 pm
But in Connecticut, a new lawsuit (Martin v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm
Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
The District, supported by its member towns, has an interest in avoiding compliance costs associated with the permit and has challenged the effluent limitations as premature and unsupported by the scientific record. [read post]
