Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 1:02 pm
Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:27 am
“The roughly $80 million in combined cuts proposed for these two agencies isn’t even pocket change in the context of the overall federal budget deficit,” said Barbara Roper, director of investor protection for Consumer Federation of America. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:01 pm
Putney and Fletcher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
To protect authors and assigns, or promote authorship for public benefit? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
Powers v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
The consumer protection at the base of TM policy is source quality, not moral quality. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
[I]t ? [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
PNC Bank, 792 A.2d 602, 607-08 (Pa.Super.Ct.2002), and our Court has interpreted the rule to apply to all Consumer Protection Law subsections, see Santana Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
By standing up to consumer fraud and consumer rip-offs, and in the right case filing consumer protection lawsuits and class-actions you too can help ensure that other consumers' rights are protected from consumer rip-offs and unscrupulous or dishonest practices. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm
Jim Inhofe (R-OK) to block the Environment Protection Agency from enforcing Clean Air Act safeguards against carbon pollution would be a boon to big polluters and a serious setback for public health. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:18 am
Back v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:42 pm
The decision came up for en banc review earlier this summer. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:16 am
Security is important to keep unwanted snoops out of the information, ensure that it hasn’t been mixed up with other information (maybe from other networks…because this might wave privilege), and to ensure that it hasn’t been lost or destroyed. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm
Consumer reviews normally don't fit within that model of anti-SLAPP laws. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
., et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
” Okay, so I made that last part up, about the spokes-jackass, but can you blame me? [read post]
