Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 5,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Discipline involving alleged off-duty misconduct Local 342 v Town of Huntington, 52 AD3d 720 Local 342 brought an Article 75 action seeking to vacate an arbitrator’s award based on a “finding that the Town had just cause for suspending [an employee] from his position with the Town. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A bit of digging into United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
And yet five Appeals Court justices could not agree on the meaning of that disclaimer (DeWolfe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
According to the indictment, in late November 2010, WikiLeaks released a large amount of classified United States State Department cables on its website. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
This quotation from the Supreme Court's opinion in Tumey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:12 am
Sure, they can require you to notify the police when you move into a jurisdiction, and can forbid you from living in most parts of town. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Payments in contemplation of retirement excluded in determining an individual’s final average salary for purposes of retirement Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897 The Employees’ Retirement System member commenced service with the Town and served as its police chief from 1996 until his retirement in 2002. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
Town of Phillipsburg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
The Secretary of State must act with reasonable diligence to progress deportation. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:17 am
The fliers stated: "WARNING! [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
Cohen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 pm
But in Connecticut, a new lawsuit (Martin v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:02 pm
Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
