Search for: "US v. John Doe" Results 3881 - 3900 of 11,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  There could be no action under the Equalities Act 2010 since, although ‘belief’ is a protected characteristic, discrimination against an objectionable political belief does not count (see Grainger Plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360, [28]). [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am by Dennis Crouch
 Because the doctrine is not applied prospectively, it does not raise the concerns with unknown consequences that prospective litigation does. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
That’s the fundamental legal issue at the heart of Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That does not appear to be what was at stake in Patchak, however, where Congress used the form of general legislation to target a particular lawsuit.At the same time, it is not clear that the sound principle of generality championed by the dissent can be reduced to an administrable rule of law. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
  More recently, at the March 2018 meeting of the Human Rights Council, John Knox, the Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, will present the "Report on Framework Principles on Human Rights and the Environment" along with reports on the human right to a healthy environment, children's rights and the environment, and reports on country visits (discussed here). [read post]