Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
In the final argument of the Term, in Nevada Ethics Commission v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
The case is Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:06 am
Federalevidence blog notes the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:00 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The case of Sorrell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:32 pm
" The question in this case was whether Exemption 2 could be used to deny a FOIA request for data and maps used to help store explosives at a naval base in Washington State. -- In an opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held by a vote of 8-1 that Exemption 2 did not shield the explosive-related data and maps from disclosure. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Yet, as Barbara Black reports, no action lies against it: In Molchatsky v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
The case is Sossamon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
But while any future litigation funding agreements will undoubtedly be subject to similar scrutiny, the fact is that the door seems to be opened to the use of this type of litigation funding mechanism in Ontario at least if not elsewhere in Canada, at least when appropriately structured. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:33 pm
The plaintiff cannot shield herself from her obligation to list and produce relevant documents by invoking the implied undertaking against opposing counsel who came into possession of those documents in the previous litigation: see Wilson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
The case is Leek v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
His use of the portion, he said, had occurred twice, as part of a talk on cameras in the courtroom, and he added that he had used it in a law school class he is teaching. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
A number of the briefs highlighted the recent Wolk v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
DNA evidence can also be a shield in certain circumstances, however, using the same force it carries with a jury to show a defendant's innocence. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
The “Pickering test” [Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563] is used to determine if a public employee has been unlawfully dismissed from his or her employment for “engaging in speech. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
Exceptions to disaffirmance: • necessaries • can only be used as shield, not sword • certain labor contracts or IP licenses Children know what they are doing online, and they understand games better than we do. [read post]
