Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 13,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
In Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:43 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
Citizen, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
” United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
In determining whether the term GUARANTEED RATE has acquired distinctiveness, the TTAB considered the 6 factors set forth in In re Snowizard, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (TTAB 2018) (quoting Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
Wallace v Conagra Foods Inc., 2014 WL 1356860 (8th Cir. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:04 pm
Partially reversing the Court of Appeal, in National Paint & Coatings Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
In Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am
At the time, this was considered a direct application of the United States Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, heard 30 April – 1 May 2012. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 1:10 pm
Pure Hemp Collective Inc., Docket No. 22-01363 (Fed. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Hosp., Inc., 912 F.2d at 136. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
” A recent case from the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a trade name can be “distinct” when it incorporates two generic terms which are not typically linked together. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
United States Liability Ins. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
National Black United Fund, Inc., Cancellation No. 92013503. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm
Thanks to Judge Dow’s United Parcel Service decision, those days are about over. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm
Gold Star Resorts, Inc. v. [read post]