Search for: "United States v. David" Results 3881 - 3900 of 6,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
By contrast, the work of a city council or board, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws prohibiting the use of chemical weapons. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:03 am by Dave Maass
Because the government collects the records of every telephone call made to, from and within the United States, the vast majority of the records it collects are plainly irrelevant. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
., patent or trade mark infringement, (2) importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation into the United States of the accused products, and (3) the existence of a domestic industry relating to the product in question. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Newsflash: Brazil spied on the United States, among other countries, about a decade ago. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” On Friday the United States filed an amicus brief in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Campaign Finance: The Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 ”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
H-Net adds some interesting reviews this week, including one of David V. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:54 pm by Orin Kerr
If I’m right that this difference explains our disagreement, then we’re essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]