Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 3881 - 3900 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2014, 10:37 am by Eric Goldman
Fair use defenses dont normally support 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss because they are so fact-intensive. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by SHG
  Just because we don't learn of the law-abiding citizens who suffer the indignity of intrusion doesn't mean they don't exist, or they aren't entitled to the protections the Constitution meant to confer. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:38 am by Eric
I don't think we needed the initial interest confusion doctrine even back in the day, but I'm confident we don't need it in the modern search engine era. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:50 am by Brian M. Krause
And, if you don't know what the party is suing for, you don't know how to defend it. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:52 pm
  I love you guys, I'm flattered, and I'm happy to share tips when I can -- but I don't authenticate auction listings.) [read post]
19 May 2025, 7:26 am by Will Newman
  But if the defendant doesn't actually have that much money, then the judgment can't make the defendant pay money she doesn't actually have. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
"I think you ought to go there right now and download this chapter, and read it - if you don't already own the eight-volume treatise, which I don't, although I'm sure it is a bargain as it lists for over $1,000. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 7:00 am
But I don't think we should see trial work as our raison d'etre. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:50 pm by Zoe Tillman
Whitman Walker Executive Director Don Blanchon said today that "we're happy and very thrilled to reach a settlement amicably with the plaintiff. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 10:31 pm by Steve Kalar
Surprisingly, the Ninth didn't have a test for this situation (though concurring Judge Fisher would beg to differ). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
US Auto Parts (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google - Google can't shake cybersquatting claim: Vulcan Golf v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:43 am by Marty Lederman
 As the Bard says, when you’ve got nothing, you’ve got nothing to lose.One further word on this important point about the absence of legitimate state interests:  Unlike Judge Posner, I dont think these actual, [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:03 am by Eric
So I don't know what the judge was thinking here, but there you go. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am by David Oliver
We're glad, of course, that the court found that novelty doesn't wear off expert opinions (i.e. they don't become immune to scrutiny under Frye) just because they've been peddled to many juries for many years. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Hall
"Death penalty shouldn't stand as Oregon law," is Ron Steiner's OpEd in today's Oregonian. [read post]