Search for: "Any"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 845,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 6:06 pm
“‘Constitutional Nonsense’: Trump’s Impeachment Defense Defies Legal Consensus; The president’s legal case would negate any need for witnesses; But constitutional scholars say that it’s wrong. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:07 am
"Midwife abortion objection case heard at Supreme Court; The UK's highest court will hear legal arguments on whether midwives have a right to refuse to take any part in abortion procedures on moral grounds": BBC News has this report. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 10:16 am
“Justice Samuel Alito isn’t doing the Supreme Court any favors; If Alito is concerned about public perceptions of the court, maybe he should stop delivering speeches that adversely affect perceptions of the court”: Steve Benen has this essay online at MSNBC. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 5:53 pm
“Barrett apologizes for calling sexual orientation a ‘preference’; ‘I certainly didn’t mean and would never mean to use a term that would cause any offense to the LGBTQ community,’ she says”: Matthew Choi of Politico has this report. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:16 pm
Chief justice no longer sits in supreme court’s ideological center and has lost the power to cast the deciding vote in any ruling. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:55 am
By entering into a plea that required at least a 27-year prison sentence on one count of child exploitation, defendant waived any Eighth Amendment challenge to what that the federal district judge described as "the most unjust sentence that I have ever imposed": The U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:50 pm
"ACLU urges Obama to quickly close Guantanamo camps, court; Seeking to forestall any plans to appease the center, the ACLU puts pressure on the coming Obama administration to order closure of the Guantanamo court and camps on day one": Carol Rosenberg had this article yesterday in The Miami Herald. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 11:08 am
“Supreme Court wipes out lower court rulings in Texas abortion battle; The governor ordered a halt to nonessential medical procedures last year, which the attorney general then said applied to ‘any type of abortions'”: Pete Williams of NBC News has this report. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:48 am
“Regardless of How the Supreme Court Rules in ‘Janus,’ Labor Needs to Get More Militant; The teachers in West Virginia, Oklahoma, and Kentucky show us that successful labor action can happen in any environment”: Michelle Chen has this essay online at The Nation. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:08 am
“Before Finally Overturning Roe, Supreme Court Must Block Yet Another Insurrection Attempt; Those who care about norms, decorum, civility, institutions, and rule of law must hold the leaker and any co-conspirators fully accountable for this egregious breach”: Mollie Hemingway has this post at The Federalist. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:54 am
3B: 1-5 Effect upn vested rights and remediesThe repeal of any sections, acts or parts of acts by the enactment of this title shall not affect any right now vested in any person pursuant to any sections, acts or parts of acts so repealed, nor any remedy where an action or proceeding thereunder has been institued and is pending on the effective date of this title. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
Woman’s file today reflects that Sister, now twenty, has “anger management issues” … and, as a result, Sister is denied any meaningful contact with Woman, even though Sister keenly desires to have a relationship with Woman. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
I wasn’t gaining any ground in the argument until I used a simple analogy. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 3:55 am
MalloyAn IJ seems to have complete discretion to reopen a case sua sponte for any or no reason at all. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 3:16 pm
Instances of this would be welcome, as well as any other examples. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Doerre, Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Doerre, Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas? [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:14 am
Here is the statute section for California Penal Code 288(a): Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and … [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:31 pm
I am unclear why the language "any armed conflict" is included. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:03 am
There is ordinarily no direct contact between the separate prime contractors and the owner may disclaim responsibility for any lack of cooperation between them. [read post]
