Search for: "Application of Stevens" Results 3901 - 3920 of 4,205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 1:54 pm
Justices Stevens and Ginsburg have proved somewhat mysterious, and arguably inconsistent, in their reasoning with respect to this particular sentencing enhancment. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:56 am
US published application 20080100693, titled Method, System, and Graphical User Interface for Making Conference Calls, first claim: A computer-implemented method, comprising:establishing a first communication link between a first party and a user in response to a first action by the user;displaying a first image corresponding to the first party at an intensity that is greater than a threshold;while the first communication link is ongoing, establishing a second communication link between a… [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:04 am
In particular, Justice John Paul Stevens' opinion gives one pause. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:51 pm
The application of the statute to the vast majority of Indiana voters is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting “the integrity and reliability of the electoral process. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:22 am
It reads the applicable constitutional standard differently, one that simply gives carte blanche to most states to pass laws with any kind of neutral justification offered. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Justice Stevens, writing for three justices, said (at fn. 19):Presumably most voters casting provisional ballots will be able to obtain photo identifications before the next election. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
Justice Stevens’ opinion stresses that the Court was ruling on the law only as written, saying the Democratic challengers faced “a heavy burden of persuasion in seeking to invalidate” the 2005 law “in all its applications. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:55 am
Justice Stevens acknowledged that in the Indiana legislature, Republicans unanimously voted for the law and Democrats unanimously opposed it. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:48 am
The first non-final rejection by the USPTO in the "peer to patent" program pertained to a rejection of a claim of an HP patent based on prior art of an IBM employee (the second non-final rejection pertained to a claim of an IBM patent )In sending the program's first non-final rejection, the USPTO examiner used prior art and commentary submitted by Steven Pearson, a senior software engineer at IBM, to reject claims of an HP application. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 12:27 am
Of Bruce's text: [Steven] Curley is reluctant to talk about the progress he and his team are having. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:09 am
  No judge tries harder to be fair along with the application of excellent cerebral skills than Judge Grove. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:23 pm
Steven Rutt had written in NANOTECH AND THE PATENT SYSTEM: A REVIEW OF INNOVATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS, 2 Nanotechnology L. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:18 pm
  The Second Circuit went on: "It is not apparent to us that the principles set forth in Kimbrough have any application to mandatory minimum sentences imposed by statute. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
The court issued its decision on the same morning that it heard arguments in another closely watched death penalty case, a challenge to Louisiana's application of capital punishment for the crime of child rape. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
View the article here01/01/2006Publication: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal JusticeAuthor: Webster, Cheryl Marie ; Gartner, Rosemary ; Doob, Anthony N.IntroductionDespite the persistent notion that sex offenders have a lasting--perhaps even incurable--propensity to commit further sexual offences, this belief has not been borne out by empirical studies (see, e.g., Hanson and Bussiere 1998; Hanson and Monton-Bourgon 2004). [read post]