Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 8,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Justice Elena Kagan is not participating in this case. * United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:57 am
See, United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:36 pm
Back at the start of last year, when discussing the Cuomo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
This includes last September's Nokia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
"Plaintiff wins the battle but loses the war. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
In her article, Professor Mullenix examines the upcoming United States Supreme Court decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:41 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 6:16 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
The second suit is Hayuk v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:37 am
In Amerisure Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bart v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:41 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Ninth Chamber of the General Court gave judgment today in a fierce battle over a Community trade mark application in Case T‑170/12, Beyond Retro Ltd v OHIM, the other party to the proceedings being a US company, S&K Garments, Inc., which was victorious in the Board of Appeal. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
A precedent-setting decision at the Ontario Court of Appeal this week strikes at the heart of client concerns over the abuse of billable hours, and provides a legal framework by which clients might be able to reject law firm fees considered excessive or unreasonable.The David-and-Goliath battle, Bank of Nova Scotia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
” Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]
