Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 3901 - 3920 of 12,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:54 pm by Greg Berk
Selection of Documents The employee gets to choose which work authorization documents they will present to the employer – either one from List A or one from List B and one from List C. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Kristen J. Mathews
Civil Code § 1798.83(b)(1) gives covered businesses three alternative ways to comply with the STL’s customer education requirement: internal instruction to personnel under Section 1798.83(b)(1)(A), privacy policy posting under Section 1798.83(b)(1)(B), and making information available at places of business under Section 1798.83(b)(1)(C). [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 3:21 pm
To effectively alter the designation of a beneficiary to whom or for whose benefit insurance money is to be payable, the insured must sign an instrument:(a) with respect to which an endorsement is made on the policy,(b) that identifies the contract, or(c) that describes the insurance or insurance fund or a part of it … [57]         The deceased’s last will and testament identifies neither an endorsement on his insurance… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
 At the end of 2006 W3, which had recently purchased the company, decided to return to the “EasyRoommate” sign. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm by Sheila R. Carroll
For natural persons,[3]the SEC designated in a separate order (a) as the initial certifications, designations, or credentials, those natural persons holding in good standing the “General Securities Representative license (Series 7), the Private Securities Offerings Representative license (Series 82), and the Licensed Investment Adviser Representative (Series 65),” and (b) certain “knowledgeable employees” of private funds for investments in the funds.[4] With respect… [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 4:21 am
[Yes]Section 2(c) - Consent to Register:Precedential No. 36: TTAB Gives the Boot to Nike's Inadequate Section 2(a) and 2(c) ClaimsSection 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: WYHA? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:12 am by Daniel Schwartz
C — See the case of Starbucks Coffee Company, decided by the NLRB last week. 3. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 9:20 am
An in-house attorney for CHIQUITA conducted an internal investigation into the payments and provided Individual C [listed only as a high ranking official] with a memorandum detailing that investigation. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
They are in good company. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:34 am by war
French CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Bell J said the record companies’ argument was predicated on a wrong assumption. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:22 pm by Cathy Moran, Esq.
  The real property was not abandoned, the estate remained open, so there was no abandonment pursuant to subsection (c). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:13 am by Doug Cornelius
Since the management company was registered as an investment adviser in Massachusetts they are subject to examination and enforcement by the Secretary of the Commonwealth. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
His points with my commentary: Blogger relations: (a) pitching bloggers and (b) conversational marketing. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:14 am by jbyrne
  Despite this generous salary, the information alleges that, between 1999 and February 14, 2011, Hairston used dozens of false invoices he created for shell companies to steal from CHOP. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 7:49 pm
(B) To eliminate or correct encroachments due to errors in construction of any improvements. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm by Michael Baniak and Paul E. Freehling
  As trade secrets and non-compete laws continue to evolve from state to state in piecemeal fashion, companies should continually revisit their trade secrets and non-compete strategies in light of the evolving legal landscape and legislative trends. [read post]