Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 3901 - 3920 of 48,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 6:56 am by Thomas Long
Affirming the district court’s decision, the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court’s reasoning that, once the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
On October 15, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Teva v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:51 pm by Michel-Adrien
The total victim costs were $2.7 billion in 2008, including both tangible and intangible costs." [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:34 am
This application was dismissed and costs were awarded against the miners.Templeton claimed that the policy was void ab initio and refused to pay the miners' costs and GWM's disbursements. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:17 am
"   I just read that McDermott, Will & Emory decided that free coffee on every floor was a luxury, so stopped the coffee on one floor, leading some to question the cost savings v. morale bust the decision caused. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
., lost an important round in an FDCPA action entitled Stolicker v Muller Muller. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
., lost an important round in an FDCPA action entitled Stolicker v Muller Muller. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:46 am by Ronald Mann
ShareTuesday’s opinion in Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:16 am
County must pay for parent s appointed attorneyNoting a paradigm shift in parental rights termination cases due to House Enrolled Act 1001, one Indiana Court of Appeals judge believed the Department of Child Services instead of the counties should be responsible for the costs of appointed counsel in these types of proceedings.But the majority in In Re The Termination of the Parental Relationship of J.G., a minor child; S.G., mother, and J.G., father, and Indiana Department of Child Services… [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:38 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Since the missing information kept the IRS from being able to evaluate its reported contribution without an audit, the Tax Court determined that substantial compliance could not be used to save the taxpayer from having its deduction disallowed.RERI HOLDINGS I, LLC, JEFF BLAU, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Simon Gibbs
  Secondly, how much difficulty this is causing law costs draftsmen, solicitors and others. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
March 18 — British Columbia — Nagle v. [read post]