Search for: "Davis v. THE STATE"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 6,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:10 am
Davis, 482 F.2d 893, 908 (9th Cir. 1973); see also United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Gregory The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
In fact, the Court in 1986 in Davis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Plaintiff failed to return to Manhattan by the stated deadline under the settlement. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Demers v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:58 pm
This it failed to do.The decision is Davis-Lynch, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:52 pm
* Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:43 pm
In Arthur v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2024, 9:03 am
Davis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
D, Iain Sharp, Michael Allan Martin Davies, Denis Mazeaud, Albert A. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
In a dissenting opinion, Senior Judge Davis succinctly explained why the majority’s “crabbed plausibility analysis” was wrong: 3. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:54 am
Summary of Decision May 17, 2013 Justice Davis delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:21 am
Although not by any means a landmark case, this writer still found it interesting, and wonders where the case would've gone had the claimants argued their case differently (and admittedly, better, by the looks of the comments made by the judge).Source: Davies Collison Cave [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:27 am
In Adair v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
