Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 3901 - 3920 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am by Gene Quinn
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant was charged with Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree (PL 140.10(e)), which states: “a person is guilty of criminal trespass in the third degree when he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building or upon real property where the building is used as a public housing project in violation of conspicuously posted rules or regulations governing entry and use thereof. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
It states defendants involved in such offenses `shall forfeit to the United States such person's interest in’ any visual depictions, proceeds obtained from such an offense, and `any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to commit or promote the commission of such offense or any property traceable to such property. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
In general, that means the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), which has led the development of e-commerce law in the world. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  Yet patronymy was, and remains, dominant in the United States—at least for children born in wedlock. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) states in a letter submitted by the People that defendant has been a permanent resident of the United States since 14 January 1998. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:57 am by Justin Levitt
I know, I know: Justice Anthony Kennedy said differently in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner was a Canadian citizen, while Respondent and R were United States citizens. [read post]