Search for: "District of Columbia"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 23,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Contrast some DC cases from the same year in which the hearing officer awarded prospective private placement upon finding denial of FAPE with little or no analysis, District of Columbia Public Schs 112 LRP 47403 (SEA DC 6/12/12); District of Columbia Public Schs 112 LRP 36627 (SEA DC 5/1/12); District of Columbia Public Schs 112 LRP 30088 (SEA DC 3/28/12).I'm wondering why the relief awarded in DC seems to be out of whack? [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
On January 11, the full complement of active judges of the District of Columbia’s highest court spent more than two and a half hours hearing oral argument about the District’s respondeat superior liability standard in Trump v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:41 am
" (Board of Education Work Session; News & Observer.)Related posts: District of Columbia Appoints Schools Ombuds; Fairfax County Public Schools Names Next Ombuds; Budget Cuts Lead to End of Pasadena Schools Ombuds Program [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
On January 11, the full complement of active judges of the District of Columbia’s highest court spent more than two and a half hours hearing oral argument about the District’s respondeat superior liability standard in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 11:50 am
A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday that the Department of Education unlawfully delayed the implementation of William D. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
N.E. in the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:30 am
In an opinion issued last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals—the highest “state” court in the District of Columbia—agreed with Kaplan’s argument that his client had been improperly convicted in a “stipulated trial” on charges of the unlawful possession of a weapon and of ammunition. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:30 am
In an opinion issued last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals—the highest “state” court in the District of Columbia—agreed with Kaplan’s argument that his client had been improperly convicted in a “stipulated trial” on charges of the unlawful possession of a weapon and of ammunition. [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:34 am
Walters was the tax assessments manager for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm
Image: dcps.gif District of Columbia Public Schools requested that we pass this opportunity along to our readers. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia on Monday ruled in favor of an insurance company in a dispute with Sanford Wittels & Heisler. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:26 am
District of Columbia, 561 F. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:08 am
The murder rate in the District of Columbia is down substantially. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:00 am
Clarke School of Law at the University of District Columbia, has written a new book entitled Why Jury Duty Matters: A Citizen's Guide to Constitutional Action. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the denial of conscientious objector status to a soldier who had applied for a discharge shortly before he was to be deployed to Iraq. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in 1991 that a private plaintiff may bring a lawsuit under the Administrative Procedure Act to require an agency head and the national archivist to initiate legal action for the recovery of records that were either destroyed or removed in violation of an agency’s guidelines and directives. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:15 am
Senate defeated an amendment to the Federal Aviation Administration bill that would have reauthorized the District of Columbia's Opportunity Scholarship program. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:15 am
* Collected coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 4:14 pm
No. 03-CV-813: The District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that automated traffic cameras do not violate due process. [read post]
