Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 5,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm
It may be reasonable to treat it discreetly, but that is not the same as enforcing a right to keep it secret vis-à-vis the right of another to exercise freedom of speech by referring to it. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:14 pm
" To do otherwise, vis-a-vis a "quasi Anders brief" runs afoul of these principles. [read post]
6 May 2012, 1:45 pm
Part VI concludes. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:24 pm
The federal regulations provide that where a parent does not participate in the resolution meeting, the timelines for both the resolution process and the hearing will be delayed. 34 C.F.R. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:09 pm
Although Congress does not appropriate funds to the CFPB, the members argue that the CFPB still must provide the committee with detailed budget information. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:00 am
Namely, inclusion does not necessarily imply exclusion. ? [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board thus concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request does not extend beyond the content of the application as filed, such that the requirements of A 123(2) are satisfied. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:35 am
Creating original scholarship does not mean that an author is the only one who has ever thought of the idea or topic. 2. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
,, whether the data says this is important (ie how many people/cases/countries/businesses does this impact?) [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
., by written settlement agreement, by other settlement after the resolution period, by DP related mediation agreement, by DP complaint withdrawal, by Hearing Officer insufficiency determination), but comparable national data of this sort does not exist across states... [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
Although NOERS may have chosen rationally, from its perspective, the lesser of two evils, the marginal market premium NOERS obtained does not necessarily reflect acquiescence in the approximately $8 Merger price or negate or resolve the concerns of inevitability that animate the controlling shareholder cases…. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:53 am
Therefore, removal by the Supreme Court of lower court cases to itself does not require implementing legislation. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:51 am
So when your business partnership has gone bad, you really want to find out where you are standing and what rights you may have vis a vis the other business partners and the business. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
The binary approach is a double edged sword for those who wish to guarantee protection to a civilian population living under occupation, not only because of the far-reaching consequences of deciding that the law of occupation does not apply but also because of the equally far-reaching consequences of finding that it does. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
Salic law does not operate in France! [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Moreover, it is clear that there is an already existing government in control of the Gaza Strip which is both capable and does in fact exercise exclusive governmental powers vis-à-vis the local population – the Hamas government. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
DOE Reminder of Responsibilities Letter, supra. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:41 pm
In cases not involving FAPE, like least restrictive environment, FAPE is not in issue and Rowley does not govern. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Importantly, the application of the subject-specific factual test does not completely exempt the occu [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:30 am
Writing a personal email (that is nice) with an expedite does not hurt. [read post]
