Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
The Court of Appeals has ruled that a Title VII plaintiff who signed a forum selection clause when she commenced employment in New York must litigate his claim in California.The case is DeBello v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 12:37 pm
The Donald Sterling and V. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Citing Schnabel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
After a jury empaneled by the Middlesex County Superior Court convicted Roger Beattie of two counts of perjury in violation of 268 Massachusetts General Laws §1, Beattie appealed. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:26 am
The Bridgeport Superior Court’s decision is arguably a departure from the precedent established inBurkert v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm
An interesting decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals last Thursday, in State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Troxel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
Artie’s Auto Body et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 4:57 am
Shahar v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Bowden v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:31 pm
The Superior Court had to wrestle with the Supreme Court’s ruling in K.E.M. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Kramer v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Carlson v. eHarmony.com, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
The case is State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
The case is State v. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
The Board of Appeal also pointed out that the property protected by an action for passing off does not relate to the sign at issue but to the goodwill. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:08 pm
The sidewalk protrusion of an inch and a half simply does not qualify, the court noted. [read post]
