Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 12,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 5:53 am
As you can see from Table 1, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs met with federal agencies most frequently on the Volcker Rule, with 27, 13, and 12 meetings, respectively. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm
Does it include dual nationals? [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:27 am
Article 1(1) of the Protocol simply re-emphasises that the EUCFR creates no new competencies for the EU. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
Yes, that is fraud but talk to a lawyer before dialing 9-1-1. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:48 am
This does not apply to a mother who is breastfeeding. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 10:17 am
The Government amendments make three changes, described by the MoJ as follows:The first change disapplies the exclusions for trespass to land, trespass to the person, trespass to goods, damage to property and breach of a statutory duty for counterclaims in possession proceedings under paragraph 27 of Schedule 1.The second change disapplies the exclusions for trespass to land, trespass to the person, trespass to goods, damage to property and breach of a statutory duty for unlawful… [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 10:17 am
The Government amendments make three changes, described by the MoJ as follows:The first change disapplies the exclusions for trespass to land, trespass to the person, trespass to goods, damage to property and breach of a statutory duty for counterclaims in possession proceedings under paragraph 27 of Schedule 1.The second change disapplies the exclusions for trespass to land, trespass to the person, trespass to goods, damage to property and breach of a statutory duty for unlawful… [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 12:15 pm
The first is Royal Decree 6/2012, of March 9 (hereinafter RD 6/2012; Royal Decree = Government Decree); the second is Royal Decree Law 27/2012 of November 15 (hereinafter RDL 27/2012; Royal Decree Law = law approved by the executive using a Decree because of urgency; must be later confirmed by the parliament); the third is Law 1/2013 of May 14. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:08 am
Inventors do not enforce their right to have their inventions protected by patents pursuant to Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement, nor do patent proprietors enforce their rights pursuant to Article 28 of the TRIPS Agreement. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
The post, however, unfortunately does not provide us with a final answer on the matter. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
Co. 21 Misc3d 1 (App. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1, court decides they're sick of not being seen as individuals. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
The 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy will take place in Miami, Florida 27-29 July 2017. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:59 am
Albright, 2013 WL 673738, at *26-27. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
It has been held that taking discovery does not trigger a waiver, nor does proceeding to trial. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
” [4.13] Thus, with respect to D10, the disclaimer does not meet the provisions of A 123(2) and claim 1 of the main request is not allowable. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am
This was the "Version 1" boot. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:55 am
In other words, the TRID does not provide for early compliance to test the creditors’ policies, procedures and technology with regard to the integrated disclosures until the TRID’s effective date of August 1, 2015. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
