Search for: "Does 1-75"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 4,859
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 8:38 am
The only agency that does is the public defender’s office. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:54 am
Section 63.1 does not define the term “promotion”, however. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:30 am
Today's post serves as a reminder that breaking a tooth while trying to eat the Old 96er does not give rise to a cause of action. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
There are three key points to appreciate here: 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
In an effort to obtain a stay of the arbitration, Plattsburgh argued that the disputed provision:1. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Ben-Tzvi would co-operate in facilitating this.....[75] Failing that, it is open to Mr. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
L. 19-75 (2009).COAL.Haderlie, Nicholas T. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:29 am
We'll assume the system has a 1 in 100 false positive rate (99% accurate), and a 1 in 1,000 false negative rate (99.9% accurate). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:16 am
"** This language, said the Appellate Division, “does not require that a demand for arbitration be made to the AAA within that 10-day period. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:54 am
Whilst this appeal was always doomed to fail, it does demonstrate just how hard it is (or can be) to get the fruits of your victory. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:54 am
Whilst this appeal was always doomed to fail, it does demonstrate just how hard it is (or can be) to get the fruits of your victory. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:01 am
But the question is does this proposed regulation actually benefit taxpayers? [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
75 Fed. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
He contended that his rights were violated because:1. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Does maintaining your commitment require you to abjure all profits? [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm
The terms of the order which he made are set out in paragraphs 74 and 75 of his judgment and provide an interesting example of the substantive provisions of a modern privacy order – including the “DFT Order” at paragraph 1(a). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:28 am
Over 75 patients charged Dr. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am
The terms of the order which he made are set out in paragraphs 74 and 75 of his judgment and provide an interesting example of the substantive provisions of a modern privacy order – including the “DFT Order” at paragraph 1(a). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In other words, the act of placing correspondence critical of the employee’s conduct or performance in his or her personnel file did not constitute discipline.The basic rule set out in Holt is that a statutory disciplinary provision such as Section 75 of the Civil Service Law does not require that an employee be given a hearing or permitted to grieve every comment or statement by his or her employer that he or she may consider a criticism. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Readers may note that the statute does not set any limits on the types of reasons that may be found in s.143E notices or s.143F review decisions. [read post]
