Search for: "GRANT v. STATE"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 61,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2007, 10:00 am
Thabit Gault v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
In Ramirez-Barker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
Iqtaifan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:50 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:19 pm
On December 7, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Dutra Group v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:28 pm
See Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:46 am
The stated settlement price tag is $20M of cash. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:56 pm
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to review Moncrieffe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:36 am
Snaras v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:18 am
Moments ago, the United States Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the government's view on whether the Court should grant certiorari in American Home Products v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:07 pm
The fourth is in the case of Timothy Ray Creech v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 4:41 am
The First Department found that the motion court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting a continuance so that intervenor-insurance company could present the videotaped deposition testimony of an out-of-state nonparty witness, in Shia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Augustine School v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am
., writes: Foreign extraditions are likely to become more and more frequent in an increasingly globalized world, so United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:01 am
However, the Court dismissed the petition for discretionary review as improvidently granted. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
Supreme Court ordered the state supreme court to reconsider that ruling in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Foster v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 11:21 am
PAN argued that the USPTO’s policy of refusing to accept requests for Director Review of institution decisions violates the Appointments Clause as set out in United States v. [read post]
