Search for: "HARDING v. HAND"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 6,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Colgate & Co.) ____________________ “Price-fixing agreements, like other forms of hard core cartel agreements, are analogous to fraud and theft. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
Both decisions, handed down by very different 5-4 majorities, seem to me worthy of celebration. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
Hard to see any business objection to that one. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm
Similarly, under United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:48 am
The timing is pretty suspicious and the optics are downright horrible - but on the other hand, if I knew that my company was facing a contentious annual meeting, I think I'd take a very hard look at all my proxy disclosures, and make sure that I was comfortable that we were doing things correctly, including tallying the vote in accordance with applicable law and charter provisions. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:53 am
Supreme Court handed down a 5-3 decision, written by Justice Scalia, in the eagerly-awaited “forced arbitration/class action ban” case, American Express v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:45 am
Patent 6,233,389, titled “Multimedia Time Warping System,” was a big winner today at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit when the CAFC handed down its decision in Tivo, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
Cox v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
It is handed out to constituents. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
The decision in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
See, e.g., the Second Circuit's Specht v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This change is motivated by the concern that victims of discrimination have a hard time finding lawyers to represent them because of the uncertain payoff, and that plaintiffs fare poorly when they hire lawyers to work on contingency (rather than for hourly fees). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm
Some might remember that the parties in Lochner v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
In Wright v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
(That’s the central point of Miller v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
The decision is AFSCME District Council 37 Health & Security Fund v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:24 pm
Real blogging is hard. [read post]
