Search for: "Hall v. Law" Results 3901 - 3920 of 4,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
A federal district court holds that this is a plain misreading of the law, which requires all contributors be disclosed. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
  The fact that OHIM's mediators speak multiple languages and are familiar with the law clearly are advantages that should not be underestimated. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:20 am
Fox alleged that this wrong way round evidence weighed significantly in the judge's finding of infringement, when it should have been irrelevant to the issue of trade mark infringement both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by William E. Kovacic
In AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Had I passed Judge Ginsburg in the hall, I would have bit my tongue to ask my burning question: "What led you to smoke marijuana? [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm by Kevin
But, critically, the initial stop must have been justified under Terry v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She decries prosecutors use of tactical maneuverings to avoid so-called "Brady" disclosures (after the US Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by admin
” The most familiar example of this comes from the Supreme Court’s 1989 case, Texas v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
.'"] The key passage, from Judge Andrew Carter's opinion Tuesday in Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
  It had to be spelled out by law under the Oath or Affirmation Clause of Article VI. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:54 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
Travis Laster confronted the scope of Section 18-705 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the equivalent to New York’s LLC Law 608) which presented issues of first impression in Delaware: Gurney-Goldman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
From reviewing the case law, courts remarkably have gravitated to the second, incorrect definition. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]