Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 88,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
See Bey v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
In an Oct. 23, 2018 opinion, the Nestle court acknowledged that Jesner shifted the legal landscape for ATS claims but then made two further points. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
This principle was demonstrated recently in the case of Humberstone, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission, where legal aid was eventually granted to the mother of a child who had died in hospital (see our post and a wider discussion on legal aid at inquests). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 2:17 am
The case Strain v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:53 am
Water Dist. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
Appointing authority threatening to do what it has a legal right to do is not “coercion”Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643 Suppose an employee entitled to pre-termination “notice and hearing” is told that unless he or she immediately resigns from his or her position, he or she will be served with disciplinary charges. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Estate of Paterno v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Estate of Paterno v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:32 am
The EBSA has released new guidance interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Madison, Brown v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 6:47 am
"No" answered the Kentucky Supreme Court addressing a question of first impression in its recent decision in Osborne v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
Accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action alleging legal malpractice against the law firm defendants (see Shaya B. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 2:35 am
Finally, issues (iv) and (v) were left for future determination and further submissions. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:25 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Legal Malpractice & Attorney Discipline Opinions Body: AC36330 - Bozelko v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
As such, consideration of ECHR, art 6 ought to have formed part of the Secretary of State’s decision-making process. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:53 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
