Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 3901 - 3920 of 29,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Austria The Austrian Data Protection Authority (DPA) has held that Google Analytics breached Art 44 GDPR by failing to provide an adequate level of protection to the transfer personal data to Google LLC in t [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 3:55 pm
Poyser, Capacity and Undue Influence 2nd ed (Toronto: Carswell, 2019) at 629 in Gefen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
And we might also be suspicious of various factors that influence the ranking; for instance, it may well be that legal elites just focus more on federal circuit judges than on state supreme court justices like Justice Kruger. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
States continue to legislate as if Section 230 (and the First Amendment) doesn’t exist, and states are also lining up behind legal challenges to undercut Section 230 expressly or indirectly. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 8:06 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court has never squarely confronted this as to race discrimination, either at the federal or state level, but it has hinted that such political decisions are different. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 7:49 am by Berry Law
If these feelings rise to the level of DSM-V diagnosis from a mental health professional, then that condition may be service-connected on a ‘secondary’ basis. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Amir Cahane
  This case joined another cellphone search case and eventually was brought before an expanded panel of the Supreme Court of Israel in the matter of Orich and others v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926,  which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:58 am by Geoff Schweller
Julie Bracker, an attorney at False Claims Act Counsel who worked on the case, explained to WNN that “[p]rior to this opinion, the 10th Circuit’s decision in Potts v. [read post]