Search for: "Little v State"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 26,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Here is an interesting little tidbit for SCOTUS-watchers. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Jan. 12, 2009), the court found just about as little preemption (and probably less) as there could possibly be under Riegel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:53 am
Humane- Society v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:14 am
Plus reporting the thing to the State Bar. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm
Nothing a state appellate court can do to change was federal bankruptcy judges do, or have done. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:08 pm
A little information about how (and perhaps why) cities "race to the bottom" in fighting for business in their area. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
Sometimes the Supreme Court has said X, so there's little more that's worthwhile to be said on the subject.But not here.This is a legitimately open issue. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
Maybe not.The case is Selevan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
- And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
[More on Taylor et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:16 am
Plaut v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (Admin) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has ruled that the employment of an army chaplain involves a “a special bond of trust and loyalty” between employee and state such that the full panoply of fair trial rights under Article 6 could not apply. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
If passed, will its new provisions invite new class actions under state law, following the Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Stanford student Scott Noveck discusses oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
In RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 871, 30 August 2013, Middleton J confirmed that the question of patentability under Australian law is to be guided by the seminal and watershed decision of the Australian High Court in NRDC v Commissioner (1959) 102 CLR 252. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
