Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 45,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
[Warning: Brutally ugly opinion and long blog post ahead] The evisceration of Section 230 continues. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
That is the crux of the question in Comptroller v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
In Adolph v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:35 am
Dechert's website had the following about their recent win in a lawsuit against Fundamental: Dechert attorneys obtained a favorable judgment issued on Feb. 7 by the First Department of the New York Appellate Division in Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
Naul, supra (55 minute interval was too long to automatically preclude possibility of fabrication). [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:32 pm
On May 21, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Noll v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
In The Right to Remain Silent , Professors Charles Weisselberg and Stephanos Bibas debate the state of the right to remain silent after the Supreme Court’s decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari review of United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
16 Mar 2005, 5:47 pm
If United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:46 am
Kimco of Evansville, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Blendowski v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:38 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:56 am
Jones v. [read post]
