Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 3901 - 3920 of 20,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
However, when it comes to such patentable subject matter challenges under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
" Don't forget to ask for permission to approach a witness.Moreover, no matter what, whenever a judge starts speaking, stop whatever you are saying no matter how eloquent you may be. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:19 pm by Ilya Somin
If a single entity owns two different firms, A and B, that owner obviously suffers an injury when either A or B loses revenue—even if A's funds are completely segregated from B's, and vice versa. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am by Michael Risch
You are simply not entitled to the protections we give every other limited liability company, no matter how scummy they are, no matter how many people they rip off, no matter how putrid their business model. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Gabe Cazares, National Federation of the Blind: Need to be fleshed out, b/c current procedures are too burdensome. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
It held that the Family Court had the authority to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237(b) and Family Court Act § 651(b). [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court specifically noted that actual confusion was not plausibly alleged because the allegations were conclusory, but that didn’t matter. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
Doe's business associate is the sole owner of Company B. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   Difference b/t TM and unfair competition in this light, oversimplified, was about being attentive to the fact that attempts to divert trade by competitors is the definition of competition: unfair competition had to be distinguished from competition. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
An individualized determination of damages doesn’t preclude a predominance finding under Rule 23(b)(3); Wal-Mart involved Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm by Susan Hennessey, Quinta Jurecic
Sean Spicer appears to have confirmed the AP story at a press conference this afternoon, saying that Flynn’s lawyer contacted the transition team for guidance and was “instructed that this wasn’t the role of the transition team … this was a personal matter. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:20 am
Fox alleged that this wrong way round evidence weighed significantly in the judge's finding of infringement, when it should have been irrelevant to the issue of trade mark infringement both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 12:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
  That appears to be a violation of the requirements of 37 CFR 1.46(b)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:15 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
The fact that faster processes are generally less costly doesn’t hurt either. [read post]