Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 55,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 1:01 pm
The Sixth Circuit in Javery v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:07 am
" Zanella Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:00 pm
In Reserves Development LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
By a majority decision (5-2) the UK Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney [2011] UK SC 13, in a leapfrog appeal from a first instance decision, has held that there is no longer any justification for the immunity of expert witnesses from civil suit for breach of duty in relation to their involvement in litigation. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
In Regina v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:03 am
Ryan v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 4:51 am
In SECRETARY OF STATE v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:20 am
In International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:44 pm
Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion for 7 Justices. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:39 am
A line from "citypages":One day you're hitting Ctrl+C then Ctrl+V into blog software, the next someone's making an unflattering movie about you called Shattered Glass and you're being played by Darth Vader.neglected to addOR you could be Vice-President of the United States, President of a major Illinois university, or a University Professor at Harvard.The plagiarism in question related to gang-tackling of Sarah Palin:"Even Fox News has started to turn… [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:49 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:26 pm
Sentencing fans will be most interested to learn that in US v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:00 am
The case is Joyner v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 pm
The NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitral award on UPS v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 7:57 am
The Court's opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:20 pm
If, perchance, you want to know everything there is to know about how you can modify a trust agreement -- in particular, whether you're required to get the signatures notarized -- this is definitely the opinion for you.Spoiler alert, though: Both the majority and the concurrence agree that when the trust instrument says quite clearly that any amendment "shall be . . . acknowledged by a notary public," well, yeah, if you want to get the thing amended, you've… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:42 pm
So while the majority is right that you can't dismiss the complaint here at the pleading stage, it's going to be a pain in the butt for everyone if people get to file suit in California claiming that they need accommodations at work because they allegedly get super sick when exposed to WiFi.(2) Experts are prostitutes. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:24 am
Judge Schroeder writes the majority opinion, which is joined by a district court judge sitting by designation. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
This is a pretty good opinion to figure out where you generally stand on the resentencing provisions of Section 1172.6, which "amend[ed] the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine, as it relates to murder, to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm
Not even a major leaguer.Surely that's true for even Barry Bonds. [read post]
