Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3901 - 3920
of 21,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm
" Harbison v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 5:59 pm
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Likewise, the relevant public displayed a relatively high level of attention with regard to veterinary preparations because they affected the state of health of animals. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am
Which way next for Nokia v Daimler? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
And these posts may be of interest to you… Joe Biden v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:07 am
Drake Law School Professor Mark Kende has posted a response to my critique of his argument that Justice Clarence Thomas supports the Supreme Court’s infamous decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
” Interestingly enough, one of the leading cases in Canada dealing with the doctrine of functionality was the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Kirkbi AG v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
But he’s written a snarky op-ed about about the Trinity Lutheran case and originalism entitled, ‘Trinity’ case marks end of originalism. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:14 pm
Today, my Damon Key colleagues Ken Kupchak, Mark Murakami, Matt Evans and I filed the Opening Brief in the latest phase of County of Hawaii v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
Judge Mark L. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Ginsburg also made her mark on intellectual property law, from patent law decisions such as Microsoft Corp v AT&T, to copyright in Eldred v Ashcroft. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
After all, the use of quotation marks suggests that the objection itself must be verbatim and not a paraphrase, and the rule provides that “objections are waived if not stated as phrased. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:05 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
Jones v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
The wall of separation between Church and State (Everson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:10 am
S. patent markings, copied all but the fryer's cosmetic features, and retained an attorney to conduct a right-to-use study without telling him it had copied directly from SEB's design. [read post]
