Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 3901 - 3920 of 21,685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2020, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
Both the Arizona Republican Party and Mark Brnovich, the state’s Republican attorney general, asked the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit’s decision. [read post]
As we summarized here, Monday, August 31st (or, really, the wee hours of September 1) marked the Legislature’s last day to pass bills to Governor Newsom’s desk for approval during the second year of the 2019-2020 Legislative Session. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am by John Bellinger, Sean Mirski
Several defendants have argued strenuously that the Title III cases against them must be dismissed either because the plaintiffs do not have standing, or because the plaintiffs had failed to properly allege that the defendant companies had the necessary scienter or mental state. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am by Nedim Malovic
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:45 am by Rich Vetstein
District Court Judge Mark Wolf Issues Landmark 102-Page Opinion on Constitutionality of Massachusetts Eviction Moratorium; Gov. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]