Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 119,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
In a 5-2 decision in State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:01 am
Broke Ass Phone v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:36 pm
Wessel, 780 So. 2d 1006, 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citing State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:42 am
C. 2254(d), federal habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state court has adjudicated on the merits unless, among other exceptions, the state-court decision denying relief involves “an unreasonable application” of “clearly established Federal law, as determined by” this Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:49 pm
One of two insurance companies for George Huguely V, convicted in 2012 of murdering fellow University of Virginia student Yeardley Love, may have to defend and indemnify him in the civil suit brought by Love’s mother, a federal judge ruled Monday. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
However she stated since this was not a remedy sought by the appellants the Court should invite further submissions before finally deciding the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 5:57 pm
Noguera v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:24 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Sea & Land Power & Energy Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWHC 1419 (Admin) (29 May 2012) Bakhsh, R (on the application of) v Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust [2012] EWHC 1445 (Admin) (28 May 2012) Sreedharan, R (on the application of) v HM Coroner for the County of Greater Manchester (Manchester City District) [2012] EWHC 1386 (Admin) (28… [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:38 am
In Etheridge v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
May 9, 2012) (order on motion to certify class) (available here). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:34 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:47 am
On March 5, the Second Circuit agreed in Hayes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:03 am
About 2-1/2 months after hearing oral arguments, the Supreme Court of the United States today rendered its decision in the case of Hamilton v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
