Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of" Results 3901 - 3920 of 5,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by admin
  For historians, this is exactly why they matter. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm by velvel
During the course of its existence, NIAP has been active in both legislative and judicial matters, and was allowed to file amicus curiae briefs in the Second Circuit on the question of net equity. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:23 am by Ray Dowd
August 17, 2011) - a decision deciding a matter that was originally argued on March 7, 2007.The decision is embedded below. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:30 am by Donna
Since the affair and favoritism affected everyone, no matter their sex, it wasn’t sexual harassment. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:40 am by Jon Hyman
The EEOC explains it all for you – from Robin Shea’s Employment and Labor Insider GINA prohibits financial incentives as inducement to provide genetic information as part of employee wellness program – from Employment Law Matters EEOC sues predominantly African American hospital - for discriminating against black employees – from Developments in Employment Law Lillie Leon, 80-Year-Old Kindergarten Teacher, Sues City Over Firing From Public School –… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
What those arguments leave in their wake is a deeply felt but constitutionally ungrounded view that the mandate, and the law of which it is a part, are misguided as a matter of national policy. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:39 pm
First, a matter is material if a reasonable person would consider the matter in determining how to act. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:43 pm by Mark Graber
Abraham Lincoln appointed five justices to the Supreme Court, Noah Swayne, Samuel Miller, David Davis, Stephen Field, and Salmon Chase. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:18 am by brittania
  Teresa Miller, Insurance Division Administrator, said the state’s decision is meant to create greater stability in rates and enrollment going forward. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm by Peter J. Cavanaugh
  Therefore, owners may bring suit up to 6 years after discovery of a latent defect, no matter when that discovery occurs.The Garden City case cited by the Supreme Court is as example of the potential application of Miller-Davis. [read post]