Search for: "North v. State" Results 3901 - 3920 of 13,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
Sanford became a loyalist to the North in the midst of the South. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
A legitimate expectation can arise for expectations as to procedure but also for substantive decisions but, ordinarily, the beneficiaries of a legitimate expectation will be an individual or a small, defined, group (R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex p. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court, for state-court prosecutions of potential recipients of presidential pardons; in an accompanying essay on his eponymous blog, he discusses the relation between originalism and stare decisis as invoked by Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the Gamble  In an op-ed for The New York… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 1:20 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
Coincidentally, on the same day that those elections were being held, the Court of Appeals decided Chavez v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Fourth Circuit rejects gag order on parties and potential witnesses in North Carolina hog farm litigation [Eugene Volokh] Eighth Circuit, interpreting Missouri law’s obligation to register as “lobbyist,” leaves open possibility that requirement extends to unpaid lobbyists, also known as concerned citizens [Jason Hancock, Kansas City Star; Institute for Free Speech on Calzone v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge Robinson boldly went where no North Carolina Judge writing published Opinions had gone before last month in the case of Wheeler v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
Wetch, requiring a lower court to reconsider a challenge to North Dakota’s mandatory bar dues in light of last term’s decision in Janus v. [read post]